Subscribe to FIM Newsletter

Finland | Fight over Internet music rights goes to Court

Ahti Vänttinen

19 May 2014 — Fight Over Internet Music Rights goes to Market Court — Two sons of late Albert Järvinen, best known as gui­tarist for the Finnish rock’n’roll band Hurriganes, have tak­en Universal Music Finland to the Market Court of Helsinki over inter­net music rights. The sub­poe­na states that the orig­i­nal record con­tract from the ear­ly 1970’s does not allow for Universal to offer the music on Internet music ser­vices with­out sep­a­rate autho­ri­sa­tion. Universal is required to take out the first Hurriganes albums from the inter­net ser­vices, pend­ing a fine of 100 000 euros.

Universal, like all record com­pa­nies, main­tains that as the own­er of the mas­ter record­ings it has the right to dis­trib­ute music through var­i­ous chan­nels. The record con­tract stip­u­lates, how­ev­er, which rights have been trans­ferred to the com­pa­ny by the artists, and in which ways it is enti­tled to utilise the music. The sub­poe­na stress­es that as inter­net rights are not cov­ered by the con­tract, the com­pa­ny can­not just grab them.

50/​50 is an equi­table start­ing point for the income split between artists and record com­pa­nies for dig­i­tal music services

Ahti Vänttinen (pho­to), President of the Finnish Musicians’ Union, does not buy the rea­son­ing of the record com­pa­nies: ”It is a well-​known fact that when record com­pa­nies them­selves license music for var­i­ous uses, they are very strict on license terms. Regarding artists’ rights, they do not seem to be so nit­picky. In Sweden, the musi­cians’ union and artists have already sued three record com­pa­nies over inter­net rights in old record contracts.”

Union lawyer Per Herrey of the Swedish Musicians’ Union shares the frus­tra­tion: ”It´s time for the record­ing indus­try to stop behav­ing like the inter­net pirates, hijack­ing the rights of the artists, and leav­ing them with hard­ly any com­pen­sa­tion what­so­ev­er. Record com­pa­nies need to raise the stan­dard beyond short­sight­ed profit-​making and gain some real respect from peo­ple who love and con­sume music.”

Benoît Machuel, the General Secretary of the International Federation of Musicians (FIM) con­sid­ers such lit­i­ga­tions inevitable: ”The record­ing indus­try has sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly ignored what is writ­ten in the old con­tracts on trans­fers of rights. They have tak­en a cal­cu­lat­ed legal risk trust­ing that artists can once again be kept silent. As Spotify and oth­er dig­i­tal ser­vices do not pro­duce a rea­son­able income share for the artists, such court cas­es are to be expect­ed in many coun­tries. Internet rights need to be specif­i­cal­ly acquired from the artists through nego­ti­a­tions, includ­ing the roy­al­ty base. FIM con­sid­ers that 50/​50 is an equi­table start­ing point for the income split between artists and record com­pa­nies for dig­i­tal music services.”

The case focus­es on 1970’s record­ings of Albert Järvinen for the Love Records label. The rights of the albums have been trans­ferred to Universal through busi­ness trans­ac­tions. The fight over inter­net rights is pri­mar­i­ly a mat­ter of prin­ci­ple, as music ser­vices result only in hun­dreds of euros per year for the heirs of Albert Järvinen.

Contacts
Finnish Musician’s Union
Ahti Vänttinen, President | ahti.​vanttinen@​muusikkojenliitto.​fi
Sanni Kahilainen, Communications offi­cer | sanni.​kahilainen@​muusikkojenliitto.​fi

Share This