Subscribe to FIM Newsletter

European Conference on social dialogue in the audiovisual sector

Tallinn, 22 – 23 October 2012. In Tallinn, on the 22 and 23 October 2012, social part­ners of the European audio­vi­su­al sec­toral social dia­logue com­mit­tee organ­ised a con­fer­ence on social dia­logue in the audio­vi­su­al sec­tor in Estonia, Latvia, Poland and the Czech Republic.

Rounding off a series of nation­al work­shops, the con­fer­ence pro­vid­ed an oppor­tu­ni­ty to mea­sure both pos­i­tive aspects of social dia­logue in the region as well as dif­fi­cul­ties social part­ners are encoun­ter­ing. Although the cri­sis is affect­ing all the sec­tor, nation­al pic­tures show sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ences. In Estonia and Latvia, nego­ti­a­tions have result­ed in sat­is­fac­to­ry col­lec­tive agree­ments, main­ly due to the fact that unions are well orga­nized and that part­ners are “open-​minded”. On the oth­er hand, Czech and Polish unions are fac­ing great dif­fi­cul­ties. In Poland in par­tic­u­lar, the pub­lic audio­vi­su­al sec­tor is hit by a mas­sive drop in resources and unions are suf­fer­ing from sig­nif­i­cant fragmentation.

The issue of union rep­re­sen­ta­tion in the com­mer­cial sec­tor was clear­ly stat­ed, and par­tic­i­pants insist­ed on the poor abil­i­ty of unions to meet the expec­ta­tions of non-​salaried work­ers who have no access either to social pro­tec­tion or the ben­e­fits of col­lec­tive agree­ments. In this case agree­ments are con­sid­ered incom­pat­i­ble with the prin­ci­ple of free com­pe­ti­tion between “ser­vice providers”. In par­tic­u­lar, in the Czech Republic, per­form­ers have no union rep­re­sen­ta­tion because, since the sec­tor only employs non-​salaried per­sons (hence with­out an employ­ment con­tract), the gov­ern­ment con­sid­ers that unions do not have any legal basis for rep­re­sent­ing this cat­e­go­ry of workers.

Social part­ners have pre­pared a pro­posed joint dec­la­ra­tion which indi­rect­ly refers to the right to col­lec­tive bar­gain­ing for all work­ers, includ­ing those who are most exposed. The text is still await­ing to be offi­cial­ly agreed by employers.

Share This